You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Mar 21, 2024. It is now read-only.
I've been testing CUDA11 integration with a recent release (7.8.0) of Cupy and found that cub's spmv was returning incorrect results. The results almost appear as though the data is being corrupted (potentially from incorrect array indexing). cupy/cupy#3822 contains the detailed summary of the problem.
Here's a simple example of what we're seeing. a is using cub's device_spmv and b is not:
The problem seems isolated to this commit: NVlabs@b2e64cf and when that commit is reverted, the example above returns correct results (again, a is using device_spmv and b is not):
I'm not sure if there are any automated tests for device_spmv.cuh internally, but I quickly grepped the tests in this repository for spmv and didn't get any results.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
cjnolet
changed the title
Recent change in device_spmv.cuh causing failures in cupy
Recent change in device_spmv.cuh causing incorrect results
Aug 21, 2020
I've been testing CUDA11 integration with a recent release (7.8.0) of Cupy and found that cub's spmv was returning incorrect results. The results almost appear as though the data is being corrupted (potentially from incorrect array indexing). cupy/cupy#3822 contains the detailed summary of the problem.
Here's a simple example of what we're seeing.
a
is using cub'sdevice_spmv
andb
is not:The problem seems isolated to this commit: NVlabs@b2e64cf and when that commit is reverted, the example above returns correct results (again,
a
is usingdevice_spmv
andb
is not):I'm not sure if there are any automated tests for
device_spmv.cuh
internally, but I quickly grepped the tests in this repository forspmv
and didn't get any results.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: