You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
The AvailabilityAnalysis class added in #131 requires four inputs: system power, subsystem power, system cumulative energy, and system expected power. The AvailabilityAnalysis class implements two separate analysis strategies, each of which needs only a subset of the three measured fields, but there is no way to only run one of the strategies for datasets that don't have all the fields.
Describe the solution you'd like
Some way to provide the class with only a subset of the inputs and run whichever strategy uses only those inputs. E.g. if a system doesn't have cumulative energy data, then run whatever analysis can be done without it instead of failing immediately.
Describe alternatives you've considered
None
Additional context
The notebook currently shows one way of "getting around" this requirement, but it's sort of hacky and is only half of the desired solution -- it only gives results for loss_system, but the other way round (only giving results for loss_subsystem) isn't possible.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
The AvailabilityAnalysis class added in #131 requires four inputs: system power, subsystem power, system cumulative energy, and system expected power. The AvailabilityAnalysis class implements two separate analysis strategies, each of which needs only a subset of the three measured fields, but there is no way to only run one of the strategies for datasets that don't have all the fields.
Describe the solution you'd like
Some way to provide the class with only a subset of the inputs and run whichever strategy uses only those inputs. E.g. if a system doesn't have cumulative energy data, then run whatever analysis can be done without it instead of failing immediately.
Describe alternatives you've considered
None
Additional context
The notebook currently shows one way of "getting around" this requirement, but it's sort of hacky and is only half of the desired solution -- it only gives results for
loss_system
, but the other way round (only giving results forloss_subsystem
) isn't possible.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: