Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Doc updates from ufs v2.0.0 #94

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 16, 2021
Merged

Doc updates from ufs v2.0.0 #94

merged 2 commits into from
Apr 16, 2021

Conversation

llpcarson
Copy link

@llpcarson llpcarson commented Apr 14, 2021

Description

Documentation updates from the UFS v2.0.0 release

Fixes #81

Related PRs
ufs-community/ufs-weather-model#521
NOAA-EMC/NEMS#96
NOAA-EMC/fv3atm#280
NCAR/ccpp-physics#626

How Has This Been Tested?

The ufs-weather-model regression tests pas on all Tier 1 platforms

Checklist:

Please check all whether they apply or not

  • [x ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
  • [ x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • [ x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • [ x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • [ x] My changes generate no new warnings
  • [ x] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules

Copy link
Collaborator

@junwang-noaa junwang-noaa left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I am not sure if I am the right person to review this PR. Rusty reviewed and approved it, I assume it is OK.

@bensonr
Copy link
Contributor

bensonr commented Apr 16, 2021

@junwang-noaa - I was looking for your agreement as to whether this is the correct documentation for the develop branch to carry forward.

@junwang-noaa
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks, Rusty. Yes, the UFS develop branch now points to the GFDL dev/emc branch which has all the dycore changes from ufs v2.0.0 except the decomposition reproducibility fix. I think it would be good to have the dycore document updated with v2.0.0

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants