New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Use better terminology for RDF equivalency #7

Closed

webb opened this issue May 1, 2018 · 2 comments

Milestone

Member

webb commented May 1, 2018

In v4.0alpha1 rule 4-2, use better terminology than "equal to" for RDF equivalency.

Member Author

webb commented May 1, 2018

See https://www.w3.org/TR/2014/REC-rdf11-concepts-20140225/#entailment for RDF equiavalence intro.

See https://www.w3.org/TR/2014/REC-rdf11-concepts-20140225/#graph-isomorphism for graph isomorphism.

Member Author

webb commented Nov 12, 2019

Use Equivalent from the first link above. Define the term and use it in 4-2.

webb closed this as completed in

421a64c

webb added this to the v4.0 milestone

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment