This repository has been archived by the owner on Feb 6, 2025. It is now read-only.
Replies: 7 comments 10 replies
-
|
The configuration looks correct. The message |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
4 replies
-
|
Thanks for the reply! I thought it was all updated, but to be sure went through the whole process again: Install Debian Bookworm 64bit on RPi 5 set conf files run motionplus result: webcontrol is visible, just no meaningful content Output in console: motionplus.log appears to do better: Then update the kept back updates (using the UI this time) Run motionplus again. Output in the log: Webcontrol still runs without cameras. I'm a bit at a loss :( Kind regards, |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
When I turn on setup mode, I get: But in the webinterface nothing is editable. Am I missing something there? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Motionplus requires a camera.conf file. At this point it is easier for you to just add that to the bottom of the motionplus.conf file. An additional configuration parameter within Motionplus controls whether the parameters can be adjusted via the webcontrol page. Next, it is better to post full logs instead of snippets. Reviewing one of the log bits from above reveals an important tidbit. Finally, there was a revision somewhere upstream in the kernel or libcamera that caused some problems that may be cascading down in this situation to the 0.2.0 version you are using. The log message |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Thanks @Mr-Dave . I've found the 'editable option' in the conf options: On the camera conf: It crashes with the following output in the terminal: And the following in the log: Commenting the line in motionplus.conf (so, no longer pointing to the camera1.conf) gives me access to the webcontrols again and this in the terminal: I need to terminate the process with Ctrl-C and this in the log: I must say, I did see the strange resolution line at some point, but forgot about it again. As to a patch to the issue, is that something to wait for? Depends on github/raspberrypi folks I guess? Thanks and kind regards, |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Yea...so as I previously indicated..
You should start with having a fresh and updated system. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
-
|
Well, I did three times now in total. One time just trying to get it freshly set up, one time to write down the steps and one time on your advice. What should I do different in the steps as described above with a fresh install? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
It does not appear that your system is updated. i.e. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
|
I always to update/upgrade after flashing the sd and before anything else. I have ran dist-upgrade the first time 'round, but it stopped somewhere in the process, don't recall why (I did not try again as the output it gave made me feel it is about the most desperate option) So basically, you are saying that I should see v 0.3 of libcamera in the terminal's crash report (if at all)? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
You will need to overcome that fear. Using an updated system is a basic requirement. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
2 replies
-
|
It must have been another command probably (must have misremembered). Running apt dist-upgrade gave me the exact same output as apt upgrade (which I always use after flashing). [edit] and: [edit 3] I also tried this: |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
This is what apt upgrade _and the UI upgrade tool show: actually having run the updates (terminal), the UI still wants to upgrade multiple packages including some libcamera related: |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
This time I did not also run the updates from the UI but rebooted after apt upgrade and the UI had no updates notification anymore. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
-
|
I guess this is for another thread (loosing connection with the camera): And there's a lot of 'unsupported v4l2 pixel format rpbp' messages: But that is for tomorrow-me... |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I saw the update, so I'm gonna get that next, but: while also seeing: |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
2 replies
-
|
I had a similar issue setting motionplus up on Bookworm 64bit Full PiOS and managed to get it up and running so this may help. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Thanks @RaspberryConnect , Eventually I just ran apt get and rebooted. That made the UI no longer show it had updates. Not sure why that, after running |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
I'm trying to run MotionPlus on my RPi5. libcamera-hello works fine, so the camera is connected OK and functional. However, I cannot get the camera to show anything, or even be recognized in the webcontrol page.
My motionplus.conf file is as follows:
With this conf file, motionplus starts, webcontrol shows the various things, but no camera.
If I uncomment the camera1.conf, the console shows:
The camera1.conf file contains the following:
Kinda lost at what the right configuration is... :(
Any help is much appreciated.
Kind regards,
Manno
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions