-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 167
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Health check #170
Comments
@GKTheOne that would be nice (and easy to implement). 👍 from me. |
I'll work on a PR soon(-ish) unless someone beats me to it. (Warning: I've only been doing ruby for less than a week) |
@GKTheOne are you planning to support also cc @moolitayer |
@GKTheOne could you please add a link in this issue's first comment to k8s docs on relevant api bits? |
+1 Is this about /healthz for kubelet or containers health check? |
I was thinking about just the apiserver /healthz endpoint. Mainly as a simple availability check. However after a quick google turned up nothing explicit documentation-wise, and based on @simon3z and @abonas comments, I'm starting to think a) /healthz will probably be deprecated, or at least is 'private', and b) you all have bigger ideas on 'health check' 😃 I'll do some digging this weekend and see what turns up. @simon3z : What do you mean with @abonas : Can you expand on what you mean re: "health check"? I'm thinking that a /healthz kubelet check could be done by simple http(s) checks (after getting the node list via kubeclient 😄 ), and a containers health check would also be done by other methods ... but I don't know what you're thinking. Cheers, |
|
@GKTheOne: |
Thanks for that. I'll be a bit busy for the next couple of days (2-3), but I'll get back to this then. |
n/a |
Support for the /healthz path?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: