We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
When running the unit test test_copy:test_copy() on GitHub for python3.7 and pandas==1.3.5 the following error will occur
test_copy:test_copy()
python3.7
pandas==1.3.5
# Shallow copy of data node = other.dataframe.index.get_level_values("node")[0] profile = other.dataframe.index.get_level_values("profile")[0] other.dataframe.loc[(node, profile), "nid"] = -1 > assert ( other.dataframe.loc[(node, profile), "nid"] == self.dataframe.loc[(node, profile), "nid"] ) E assert -1.0 == 26.0
This error does not happen when running locally, tested with python3.7.2 and pandas==1.3.5.
python3.7.2
Our current fix was to change the pandas version on GitHub to pandas==1.2.5 and the error does not occur. For reference the error does not occur for pandas==1.4 and pandas==2.0, so our suspicion is the error only occurs for pandas==1.3.5.
pandas==1.2.5
pandas==1.4
pandas==2.0
This is somewhat known by pandas and they fixed the inconsistency in pandas==1.5. See:
pandas==1.5
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Resolved by depreciating Python 3.7 (#107)
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
Problem
When running the unit test
test_copy:test_copy()
on GitHub forpython3.7
andpandas==1.3.5
the following error will occurThis error does not happen when running locally, tested with
python3.7.2
andpandas==1.3.5
.Current Fix
Our current fix was to change the pandas version on GitHub to
pandas==1.2.5
and the error does not occur. For reference the error does not occur forpandas==1.4
andpandas==2.0
, so our suspicion is the error only occurs forpandas==1.3.5
.This is somewhat known by pandas and they fixed the inconsistency in
pandas==1.5
. See:The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: