Skip to content

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Authentication Methods Unclear #718

Closed
dwhagar opened this issue Oct 3, 2017 · 3 comments
Closed

Authentication Methods Unclear #718

dwhagar opened this issue Oct 3, 2017 · 3 comments
Labels

Comments

@dwhagar
Copy link

dwhagar commented Oct 3, 2017

So, is the only authentication method that is actually usable, htpasswd?

The config file that comes with the distribution clearly states:

[auth]
# Authentication method
# Value: None | htpasswd | IMAP | LDAP | PAM | courier | http

Of course, setting the type= to IMAP, LDAP, or PAM shows that there are no Python files for those authentication methods. Taking a look at the actual code, it clearly shows that such a module has yet to be written. From what I read on another issue, this has been intentionally done but the config file suggests it has not? What gives? Why was this removed? Is there a workaround?

@Tntdruid
Copy link

Tntdruid commented Oct 4, 2017

Can only use htpasswd, the OS dist is a outdated version.

http://radicale.org/setup/

@kousu
Copy link

kousu commented Aug 8, 2021

Hiya,

I'm also wondering what the plan here is. Would you be open to accepting a new Radicale 3.0-compatible auth/pam.py and auth/imap.py files? As recently as half a year before this thread (#552 (comment)) PAM was still supported.

@pbiering pbiering added the old version relates to no longer supported versions label Mar 18, 2024
@pbiering
Copy link
Collaborator

@kousu : if required, please submit PR for authentication using PAM or IMAP against latest 3.x

@pbiering pbiering added feature prio:low low priority and removed old version relates to no longer supported versions labels Mar 18, 2024
@Kozea Kozea locked and limited conversation to collaborators Mar 18, 2024
@pbiering pbiering converted this issue into discussion #1459 Mar 18, 2024

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants