-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 113
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
resample() performance #498
Comments
This might be a few months late, but I had the same problem: I want to resample many short signals with a real-valued resampling rate, for which the filter is quite long (~37k samples) and takes a while to compute. If the rate is constant, you can compute the filter once, and provide it as an argument to
Note that this only helps because the output length is significantly shorter than the filter length -- if Should this be mentioned in the documentation? |
I also have found resampling to be a bottleneck in some processing and this helps. It would be great if |
See also #506. |
Hi all,
I have a workflow which requires a lot of resampling. The default filter used in
resample
is currently a bottleneck in my workflow, where a lot of time is spent in evaluating the Kaiser window (more preceisely: https://specialfunctions.juliamath.org/stable/functions_list/#SpecialFunctions.besseli )Any tips on how I can improve performance?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: