Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Can we get rid of LA152.transportation and L252.transportation? #1220

Open
russellhz opened this issue Oct 14, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

Can we get rid of LA152.transportation and L252.transportation? #1220

russellhz opened this issue Oct 14, 2022 · 1 comment

Comments

@russellhz
Copy link
Collaborator

Don't seem to be used anymore

@pkyle
Copy link
Contributor

pkyle commented Oct 14, 2022

These were left in, in case we ever wanted to revive "MiniCAM" which would hypothetically have scaled-down representations of the end-use sectors, ideally among others. The same logic would apply to all of the following files, which could be removed in a single commit if we want:

inst/extdata/energy/A42.*.csv
inst/extdata/energy/A52.*.csv
R/zchunk_LA142.building_agg.R
R/zchunk_LA152.transportation.R
R/zchunk_L242.building_agg.R
R/zchunk_L242.Bld_Inc_Elas_scenarios.R
R/chunk_L252.transportation.R
R/zchunk_L252.Trn_Inc_Elas_scenarios.R
R/zchunk_batch_bld_agg_xml.R

The "MiniCAM" end use sectors capability hasn't been tested in a LONG time, and probably doesn't work anyway. The aggregate transportation XML files don't even get built anymore. Fine by me to get rid of them all.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants