Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

How power line is attached to support #492

Closed
5 tasks done
Jean-BaptisteC opened this issue Nov 16, 2023 · 2 comments
Closed
5 tasks done

How power line is attached to support #492

Jean-BaptisteC opened this issue Nov 16, 2023 · 2 comments

Comments

@Jean-BaptisteC
Copy link

Jean-BaptisteC commented Nov 16, 2023

General

Affected tag(s) to be modified/added: line_attachment
Question asked: How power line is attached on this support?

Checklist

Checklist for quest suggestions (see guidelines):

  • 🚧 To be added tag is established and has a useful purpose
  • 🤔 Any answer the user can give should have an equivalent tagging (SCEE quests may not be answerable in all cases, but please keep this rare)
  • 🐿️ A survey is necessary (may require knowledge of the subject, though easy answering for everyone is preferred)
  • 💤 Not an overwhelming percentage of quests have the same answer (No spam)
  • 🕓 Applies to a reasonable number of map data (Worth the effort)

Ideas for implementation

Element selection:

  • Power pole and power tower without line_attachment key
  • This quest is not to tag complex configurations (case where we have 2 differents line_attachements in same node)

Metadata needed:
No local metadata

Proposed UI:
Photos or drawings

One proposition has already proposed on main repo streetcomplete#4825

@Helium314
Copy link
Owner

That would certainly be acceptable, but I think it would be good to have some decision about the quest in SC first. Currently it hasn't been declined, and implementing quests in SC is preferable as it reaches far more users.

@Jean-BaptisteC
Copy link
Author

Thanks for your feedback, our quest has been accepted on main repo with just more arguments :)
I close this issue

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants