-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 16
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update StandardNamesRules.rst: changesurface
prefix to _at_surface
suffix
#72
Changes from 2 commits
61db163
64df1db
f7a2e0c
743f35c
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ CCPP Standard Name Rules | |
words or phrases to be substituted. The new standard name is constructed by | ||
joining the base standard name to the qualifiers using underscores. | ||
|
||
[``surface``] [``component``] standard_name [*at* ``surface``] [*in* ``medium``] | ||
[``component``] standard_name [*at* ``level``] [*in* ``medium``] | ||
[*due_to* ``process``] [*assuming* ``condition``] | ||
|
||
See the list of currently-used qualifiers below for help. | ||
|
@@ -152,9 +152,9 @@ XY-surface | |
Prefixes | ||
^^^^^^^^ | ||
|
||
| toa | ||
| tropopause | ||
| surface | ||
None. Note that this is a departure from the CF conventions, which use | ||
surface_ as a prefix. This is to maintain consistency with all other | ||
level qualifiers that are used as _at_level-qualifier (i.e. as suffix). | ||
|
||
Suffixes | ||
^^^^^^^^ | ||
|
@@ -173,6 +173,9 @@ Suffixes | |
| at_top_of_atmosphere_model | ||
| at_top_of_dry_convection | ||
| **at_interfaces** | ||
| **at_toa** | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Is there a difference between "toa" (defined as "top of atmosphere") and "top of atmosphere model"? This may be worthy of a separate discussion, if so I won't hold up this PR but we can address it later. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. If that question is directed to me than I don't have a definitive answer for you, sorry. |
||
| **at_tropopause** | ||
| **at_surface** | ||
| **at_surface_adjacent_layer** | ||
| **at_2m** | ||
| **at_10m** | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Personally, I am okay with the
surface_
variables that define quantities at the surface. This is partially because that is the way CF defines variables (which allows us to follow rule 1 more closely) and partially because in an atmosphere model, surface variables are usually derived from other model variables.