Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature request: exclude rules #1

Open
kerim opened this issue Oct 23, 2022 · 5 comments
Open

Feature request: exclude rules #1

kerim opened this issue Oct 23, 2022 · 5 comments

Comments

@kerim
Copy link

kerim commented Oct 23, 2022

Thanks for working on this plugin, it is something I've wanted for a long time. But I don't always want it to mark tasks as completed. It would be nice to allow some exclusions, for instance if the block has certain tags present, or even certain kinds of tasks (TODO but not NOW, etc.) One thing I noticed with the version I installed (which isn't the latest one), is that I can't even delete the property unless I disable the plugin.

@DimitryDushkin
Copy link
Owner

Thanks for working on this plugin, it is something I've wanted for a long time. But I don't always want it to mark tasks as completed. It would be nice to allow some exclusions, for instance if the block has certain tags present, or even certain kinds of tasks (TODO but not NOW, etc.) One thing I noticed with the version I installed (which isn't the latest one), is that I can't even delete the property unless I disable the plugin.

Hey! Glad it’s useful for you!
Please update plugin to latest version. The bug you mentioned is fixed.

I’ll think about customisation you suggested. I guess it should have a settings page then. Could you please share the workflow where this customisation might be useful?

@kerim
Copy link
Author

kerim commented Oct 23, 2022

I use all the various task markers: TODO, NOW, DOING, LATER - but I use TODO differently than the others. For me this is for things like shopping lists, daily habits, quick checklists, etc. I don't want any of these marked with the date when I check them as done - only the others. Does that make sense?

@DimitryDushkin
Copy link
Owner

DimitryDushkin commented Oct 26, 2022

Yeah, thanks for sharing! I'm not planning extending it right now. TBH I'll probably switch back to Obsidian since while I was developing this plugin I got an image that Logseq is not production ready.
But I'll keep in mind your request.

@kerim
Copy link
Author

kerim commented Oct 26, 2022

Ah, too bad. I wonder if you could hand over development to someone else? Perhaps @sawhney17 would be willing to take it up? (He was planning on working on a similar feature.)

@DimitryDushkin
Copy link
Owner

DimitryDushkin commented Oct 26, 2022

@kerim I'll be happy to accept a PR and make a new release :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants