Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

does normalized data input work well? #9

Open
yingyonghui opened this issue Dec 15, 2020 · 1 comment
Open

does normalized data input work well? #9

yingyonghui opened this issue Dec 15, 2020 · 1 comment

Comments

@yingyonghui
Copy link

Thanks for your amazing tool for deconvolution of the bulk data.
The manual said that it accepts raw count matrix from the scRNA-seq, I'm just wondering whether normalized expression matrix (in log scale or something else) would also works well?
And does this requirement also apply to the bulk data or not?

Many thanks!
Yonghui

@tinyi
Copy link
Collaborator

tinyi commented Dec 15, 2020

Hi Yonghui,

Thank you for your interest in our tool.

BayesPrism does not work with the log transformed data, as it uses multinomial distribution to model the raw count. You may exponentiate the data and convert back to the raw scale.

BayesPrism is highly robust to linear transformations including RPM, RPKM. Linearly transformed data can be directly used as input in BayesPrism (although raw count is always recommended).

Let me know if there is any other question.

Best,

Tinyi

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants