Specimen related fields in Sample Registration

[mshadbolt]

Several fields in the Sample Registration object seem that they would be more appropriate within the Specimen object, these are:

• specimen_type
• specimen_tissue_source
• tumour_normal_designation

In addition, the specimen_type and tumour_normal_designation appear to contain overlapping information, it is unclear why both would be needed within one object.

See v2 google sheet: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/17Azd7dIORYIXk-czIEYJW9gNGgr6_IDmjRv1F20bEIU/edit#gid=0&range=B7

(edited to include comment below)

[kcranston]

The same question holds for tumour_normal_designation which is under the Sample Registration schema but describes a Specimen.

[jmtnelson]

I thought we agreed to move these fields sometime ago. the specimen table is very awkward for the normal sample, there is essentially no field other than collection that pertain to the normal.