Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Vendor caching is f'd #844

Closed
vthornheart-bng opened this issue Dec 31, 2018 · 4 comments
Closed

Vendor caching is f'd #844

vthornheart-bng opened this issue Dec 31, 2018 · 4 comments
Labels
bug filed A bug has been filed in BNet's internal bug tracking system for this request/report. bug ready for release

Comments

@vthornheart-bng
Copy link
Contributor

I got a report today and was able to confirm that Vendor caching isn't behaving properly. If you request two characters' vendor data on the same account before our 60 second cache has expired, you'll get the vendor data from the first character that you happened to request.

This will be fixed in the January deployment!

@vthornheart-bng vthornheart-bng added bug bug filed A bug has been filed in BNet's internal bug tracking system for this request/report. ready for release labels Dec 31, 2018
@afpac
Copy link

afpac commented Dec 31, 2018

Awesome. I experienced this when I was developing the light.gg Director, but wasn't able to reliably make it happen. Happy to see it'll be sorted soon

@serkanbal
Copy link

Thank you, Alex. Do we have a date for the January deployment?

@vthornheart-bng
Copy link
Contributor Author

It looks like it'll make the boat for the deployment currently scheduled for January 22nd - a bit of a ways out unfortunately, but that's our next major release window.

@vthornheart-bng
Copy link
Contributor Author

This should be fixed as of today's deployment (1/29)!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug filed A bug has been filed in BNet's internal bug tracking system for this request/report. bug ready for release
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants