Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Moving configuration to a DB #91

Open
s0lst1ce opened this issue Dec 11, 2019 · 2 comments
Open

Moving configuration to a DB #91

s0lst1ce opened this issue Dec 11, 2019 · 2 comments
Labels
quality all issues which only affect the way code is written and that won't affect functionnality question Further information is requested

Comments

@s0lst1ce
Copy link
Collaborator

My feature request is about

  • A new feature
  • Changing a feature

Description of the solution I'd like
Going from the current JSON config files to a DB-based configuration storage.

Additional context
I think this would be faster and it would surely be easier to communicate the configs with the website.

@s0lst1ce s0lst1ce added question Further information is requested quality all issues which only affect the way code is written and that won't affect functionnality labels Dec 11, 2019
@s0lst1ce s0lst1ce added this to the Long term development milestone Mar 13, 2020
@adrienluitot
Copy link

This could be really interesting... 🤔
It's a bit harder to setup I think, I don't know how Python links with databases (MySQL, PostgreSQL...)
I'm not sure it would be faster, but I think it could be less flexible.

@s0lst1ce
Copy link
Collaborator Author

sqlalchemy works pretty well with python (I have some experience with it with I-Craft). I've never used the ORM but it's already simple enough this way. Not sure about the speed but it would make it more reliable I think. Harder to setup for sure though.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
quality all issues which only affect the way code is written and that won't affect functionnality question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants