You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Description of the solution I'd like
Going from the current JSON config files to a DB-based configuration storage.
Additional context
I think this would be faster and it would surely be easier to communicate the configs with the website.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
s0lst1ce
added
question
Further information is requested
quality
all issues which only affect the way code is written and that won't affect functionnality
labels
Dec 11, 2019
This could be really interesting... 🤔
It's a bit harder to setup I think, I don't know how Python links with databases (MySQL, PostgreSQL...)
I'm not sure it would be faster, but I think it could be less flexible.
sqlalchemy works pretty well with python (I have some experience with it with I-Craft). I've never used the ORM but it's already simple enough this way. Not sure about the speed but it would make it more reliable I think. Harder to setup for sure though.
My feature request is about
Description of the solution I'd like
Going from the current JSON config files to a DB-based configuration storage.
Additional context
I think this would be faster and it would surely be easier to communicate the configs with the website.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: