Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Is it possible to run the publisher as a standalone module? #559

Closed
AndreasDpWD opened this issue Jun 16, 2020 · 4 comments
Closed

Is it possible to run the publisher as a standalone module? #559

AndreasDpWD opened this issue Jun 16, 2020 · 4 comments
Assignees
Labels
feature request New feature or request

Comments

@AndreasDpWD
Copy link

We want to run a small and scalable environment. But we only need the twin and publisher module to communicate with a robot.

With the legacy mode, we can configure the publisher on the machine with the modules, and the twin module is recovering a C2D method request for reading values.

So is it possible or what is the minimum amount of resources to run the publisher? Where is it documented? I can see in the code the C2D methods are removed in the new version.

As I read it the publisher is getting is configuration from the CosmosDB?

@marcschier marcschier added the feature request New feature or request label Jun 24, 2020
@marcschier marcschier added this to the 3.0 milestone Jun 24, 2020
@marcschier
Copy link
Collaborator

We are currently planning a fully contained Edge hosting option for the entire platform. Tentative for 3.0.

At this point, publisher can either be configured via publishednodes.json file or via the API (and thus CosmosDB).

@rowenwu
Copy link

rowenwu commented Jun 24, 2020

hi @AndreasDpWD , I'm the PM helping to coordinate our roadmap, and I'd like to better understand your requirements so we can capture them and align them with our roadmap (potentially for 3.0, as Marc called out). If you would like to hop on a call to chat, send me an email at [email protected]

@marcschier
Copy link
Collaborator

Duplicate: #464

@barnstee barnstee assigned barnstee and jehona-m and unassigned barnstee Sep 17, 2020
@barnstee barnstee removed this from the 3.0 milestone Sep 17, 2020
@barnstee
Copy link
Member

Standalone mode is supported from V2.7 onwards and documented in our Ops manual, please try our latest version (2.7.183).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature request New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants