-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 82
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Question: Deprecated transHash Field #136
Comments
From the announcement the field won't be removed:
BUT Will it still respondTo |
I think it will. But I'm not that good with python. Anyone ? ❤️ |
@denispasin Ah, I overlooked the part:
|
Help me out here. Doesn't the library use the hash to validate the transaction response is legitimate? Or this considered an application level concern? |
Hi, As per the official announcements, transHash (which uses MD5 based hashing) will be deprecated and a new field transHashSHA2 (based on SHA-512 based hash utilizing a Signature Key) has been made available. To perform verification on this field, we have provided a sample code for convenience. Do let us know if you have any further questions on this. |
TCS-Dev Dhanashree- As per the official announcements, transHash (which uses MD5 based hashing) will be deprecated and a new field transHashSHA2 (based on SHA-512 based hash utilizing a Signature Key) has been made available. |
According to MD5 Hash End of Life & Signature Key Replacement, the MD5 hash in the transHash field is being phased out and will be removed from responses soon.
I see that transHash and transHashSHA2 are referenced a few places in the apicontractsv1.py module:
Will the imminent removal of the transHash field from responses cause response parsing to break in the SDK as it stands today? Or will it handle the absence of the transHash gracefully?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: