chore: Test 0.5 sampler ratio in yt01

[oskogstad]

No description provided.

[coderabbitai]

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

This pull request involves updating the otelTraceSamplerRatio parameter across multiple Bicep parameter files. The changes consistently modify the OpenTelemetry trace sampler ratio from '0.2' to '0.5' in four different configuration files for various application components, including GraphQL, service, web API (EU), and web API (SO) configurations.

Changes

File	Change Summary
.azure/applications/graphql/yt01.bicepparam	Updated otelTraceSamplerRatio from '0.2' to '0.5'
.azure/applications/service/yt01.bicepparam	Updated otelTraceSamplerRatio from '0.2' to '0.5'
.azure/applications/web-api-eu/yt01.bicepparam	Updated otelTraceSamplerRatio from '0.2' to '0.5'
.azure/applications/web-api-so/yt01.bicepparam	Updated otelTraceSamplerRatio from '0.2' to '0.5'

Possibly related PRs

• fix(service): Avoid too many logs in app insights #1730: Modifies otelTraceSamplerRatio in .azure/applications/service/yt01.bicepparam
• chore: Set 20% otel sample rate for all apps in yt01 #1737: Updates otelTraceSamplerRatio in .azure/applications/graphql/yt01.bicepparam

Suggested reviewers

• arealmaas
• knuhau

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e43b119 and e2891e8.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)

• .azure/applications/graphql/yt01.bicepparam (1 hunks)
• .azure/applications/service/yt01.bicepparam (1 hunks)
• .azure/applications/web-api-eu/yt01.bicepparam (1 hunks)
• .azure/applications/web-api-so/yt01.bicepparam (1 hunks)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)

• GitHub Check: build / build-and-test

🔇 Additional comments (4)

.azure/applications/graphql/yt01.bicepparam (1)

9-9: Verify the impact of increased sampling rate.

The change increases the OpenTelemetry trace sampling ratio from 20% to 50%, which will result in more telemetry data being collected. Please ensure:

1. The increased data volume aligns with your monitoring requirements.
2. The increased sampling won't significantly impact application performance.
3. The costs associated with increased telemetry data collection are acceptable.

✅ Verification successful

Sampling configuration is appropriate for the environment

The 50% sampling rate in YT01 environment is well-aligned with monitoring best practices:

• Production environments maintain 100% sampling for full visibility
• Reduced sampling in YT01 is appropriate for development/testing
• The change only affects the YT01 environment, not impacting production monitoring
• Uses cost-effective AppInsights PerGB2018 pricing model

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any existing monitoring or cost-related configuration files
# that might need adjustment due to increased sampling.

echo "Searching for monitoring configuration files..."
fd -e yaml -e json -e bicep -e bicepparam . | rg -i "monitor|telemetry|cost|budget"

echo "Searching for any existing sampling ratio configurations..."
rg -i "samplerRatio|sampling.ratio|sampling_ratio"

Length of output: 372

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for OpenTelemetry configurations and related documentation
echo "Searching for OpenTelemetry configurations..."
rg -i "opentelemetry|otel|tracing" -A 3 -B 3

echo -e "\nListing all bicepparam files..."
fd -e bicepparam

echo -e "\nSearching for monitoring documentation..."
fd README.md MONITORING.md TELEMETRY.md -i

Length of output: 65848

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for bicepparam files and monitoring configurations in .azure directory
echo "Searching for bicepparam files in .azure directory..."
find .azure -type f -name "*.bicepparam" -exec cat {} \;

echo -e "\nSearching for monitoring thresholds and costs..."
find .azure -type f -name "*.bicep" -o -name "*.bicepparam" -o -name "*.json" | while read -r file; do
  echo "=== $file ==="
  cat "$file" | grep -i "monitor\|threshold\|cost\|budget\|sampl"
done

Length of output: 39850

.azure/applications/web-api-eu/yt01.bicepparam (1)

9-9: LGTM! Consistent with other files.

The change maintains consistency with the sampling ratio update across all components.

.azure/applications/web-api-so/yt01.bicepparam (1)

9-9: LGTM! Consistent with other files.

The change maintains consistency with the sampling ratio update across all components.

.azure/applications/service/yt01.bicepparam (1)

12-12: LGTM! Consistent with other files.

The change maintains consistency with the sampling ratio update across all components.

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.