Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ponder improving the read() module. #13

Open
lowderchris opened this issue Aug 14, 2017 · 0 comments
Open

Ponder improving the read() module. #13

lowderchris opened this issue Aug 14, 2017 · 0 comments
Assignees

Comments

@lowderchris
Copy link
Owner

The read module should be a bit more robust. At the moment it only returns the flux rope footprint map, though this can certainly be improved. Allow for reading specified quantities, without loading all netCDF data variables...

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant