You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I think it would be good if you mention in the last couple of paragraphs of section 3 the idea that an institution, department, or research group can host a git repository if they want to, for example if publicly available ones aren't secure, reliable, or private enough (although they won't be as good as github).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Excellent point. I'll leave this open for the revision.
On Saturday, January 26, 2013 at 2:52 PM, David Jones wrote:
I think it would be good if you mention in the last couple of paragraphs of section 3 the idea that an institution, department, or research group can host a git repository if they want to, for example if publicly available ones aren't secure, reliable, or private enough (although they won't be as good as github).
—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub (#18).
I think it would be good if you mention in the last couple of paragraphs of section 3 the idea that an institution, department, or research group can host a git repository if they want to, for example if publicly available ones aren't secure, reliable, or private enough (although they won't be as good as github).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: