We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
More of a question than an issue, but the only reference to @ in the Coffeescript documentation is this:
@
As a shortcut for this.property, you can use @property.
this.property
@property
You can also use @ as a replacement for this, e.g:
this
render: -> ... @
I guess it's an undocumented feature... in your opinion is this a good practice? Is it safe to use or could it change in future versions?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This has been discussed to great length here: #1601 (and some other issues)
Sorry, something went wrong.
Great, thanks @vendethiel for the link.
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 12:22 PM, ven [email protected] wrote:
Closed #4061 #4061. — Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub #4061 (comment).
Closed #4061 #4061.
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub #4061 (comment).
I don't think poor ven wants to be mentioned here ;)
D'oh, I mixed up the display name in email with the user name
No branches or pull requests
More of a question than an issue, but the only reference to
@
in the Coffeescript documentation is this:You can also use
@
as a replacement forthis
, e.g:I guess it's an undocumented feature... in your opinion is this a good practice? Is it safe to use or could it change in future versions?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: