+
+
+ Welcome to Battle
+
+ Press space to navigate. +
+ Press left arrow to go back. +
+ Press right arrow to go forward. +
+
+ Online at https://ignatandrei.github.io/Presentations/Battleprez.html + +
+ For download https://ignatandrei.github.io/Presentations/Battle.zip + + +
+ 
+ Andrei Ignat http://msprogrammer.serviciipeweb.ro/
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
+ Press space to navigate. +
+ Press left arrow to go back. +
+ Press right arrow to go forward. +
+
+ Online at https://ignatandrei.github.io/Presentations/Battleprez.html + +
+ For download https://ignatandrei.github.io/Presentations/Battle.zip + + +
About me
+
+ Andrei Ignat http://msprogrammer.serviciipeweb.ro/
+
+
+ For print ?print-pdf
+ For all slides press ESC
+ + + + +
+
+ System.Console.WriteLine("Ignat Andrei");
+ System.Console.WriteLine("Battle");
+ YouTube 5 minutes .NET and tools : http://bit.ly/5MinTools +
+Book Making Open Source Component : http://bit.ly/NetOpenSourceComponent
+Book Copy Paste from StackOverflow : https://amzn.to/2PQ8EDc
+Roslyn Source Code Generators with examples : + https://ignatandrei.github.io/RSCG_Examples/ +
+Monthly meetings: https://www.meetup.com/Bucharest-A-D-C-E-S-Meetup/ +
+ For notes press S+ For print ?print-pdf
+ For all slides press ESC
+ + + + +
+ We will talk about different technologies in .NET to achieve the same purpose.
+
+DataAccess: EFCore vs Dapper
+
+DataAccess: EFCore vs Dapper
+
+API: Controllers vs MinimalAPI
+
+CLI : Console App vs ASP.NET Core app
+
+Programming : Records vs Class vs Tuples
+
+OOP: Default Interface methods vs abstract class
+
+Test : XUnit vs MSTest vs NUnit
+
+
+
+
Data Access
+
+ Debate: Code to DB sau DB to Code
+
+ Pro EFCore : independenta de BD +
+
+
+
+ + Pro EFCore : independenta de BD +
| + Pro EFCORE + | ++ Pro Dapper + | ++ Contra EFCORE + | ++ Contra Dapper + | +
| + Folosesti doar LINQ si nu te gindesti la Proceduri stocate , SQL pur + | ++ Ai control asupra Sql-ului si poti sa faci optimizari + | ++ Refacerea modelului daca modific BD .... + | ++ Trebuie sa te pricepi la SQL + | +
| + Se optimizeaza cu Split Queries si AsNoTracking + | ++ Daca ai mai multa experienta cu SQL, atunci Dapper este mai usor de folosit + | ++ merge lazy loading + | ++ Nu merge lazy loading + | +
| + Crapa la build time, in loc de compile time + | ++ Mai putin boilerplate code + | ++ read heavy : setup mai greu + | ++ Contra 3 + | +
| + Scaffolding ( BD => Code ) + | ++ Cod mai simplu + | ++ Contra 4 + | ++ Contra 4 + | +
API
+
+
+
+
+
+
+ | + Pro Minimal API + | ++ Pro Controller + | ++ Contra Minimal API + | ++ Contra Controller + | +
| + Simplitate - pentru programatori incepatori + | ++ Are de toate : Autentificare, Autorizare , request , filter + | ++ Stufos dupa o buna perioada de timp + | ++ Contra 1 + | +
| + Un punct bun de inceput + | ++ Pro 2 + | ++ Contra 2 + | ++ Contra 2 + | +
| + Rapid de scris + | ++ Pro 3 + | ++ Lipsesc unele functionalitati - validare cu atribute default + | ++ Contra 3 + | +
| + memoria mai mica + bun pentru microservicii ( micro !) + | ++ Pro 4 + | ++ Contra 4 + | ++ Contra 4 + | +
CLI
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+ | + Pro Console App + | ++ Pro ASP.NET Core app + | ++ Contra Console App + | ++ Contra ASP.NET Core app + | +
| + Simplu - mai putin layere + | ++ Dependency Injection by default + | ++ Mai greu de facut logging , monitoring si altele + | ++ Start time + | +
| + Pro 2 + | ++ Logging, monitoring + | ++ Contra 2 + | ++ Resurse + | +
| + Pro 3 + | ++ Scalare si concurenta + | ++ Contra 3 + | ++ Contra 3 + | +
| + Pro 4 + | ++ Pro 4 + | ++ Contra 4 + | ++ Contra 4 + | +
Programming
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+ | + Pro Records + | ++ Pro Tuples + | ++ Pro Class + | ++ Contra Records + | ++ Contra Tuples + | ++ Contra Class + | +
| + mai usor de utilizat decit tuplu + | ++ daca le folosesti o singura data , atunci named tuple + | ++ poti sa comentezi mai usor proprietatile unei clase decit ale unui tuplu / record + | ++ Contra 1 + | ++ Contra 1 + | ++ Contra 1 + | +
| + Bun la partea de dto,event, query results + | ++ Pro 2 + | ++ Pro 2 + | ++ Contra 2 + | ++ Contra 2 + | ++ Contra 2 + | +
| + Partea de egalitate + | ++ Pro 3 + | ++ Pro 3 + | ++ Contra 3 + | ++ Contra 3 + | ++ Contra 3 + | +
| + Pro 4 + | ++ Pro 4 + | ++ Pro 4 + | ++ Contra 4 + | ++ Contra 4 + | ++ Contra 4 + | +
OOP
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+ | + Pro Default Interface methods + | ++ Pro abstract class + | ++ Contra Default Interface methods + | ++ Contra abstract class + | +
| + Pro 1 + | ++ Pro 1 + | ++ Contra 1 + | ++ Contra 1 + | +
| + Pro 2 + | ++ Pro 2 + | ++ Contra 2 + | ++ Contra 2 + | +
| + Pro 3 + | ++ Pro 3 + | ++ Contra 3 + | ++ Contra 3 + | +
| + Pro 4 + | ++ Pro 4 + | ++ Contra 4 + | ++ Contra 4 + | +
Test
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+ | + Pro XUnit + | ++ Pro MSTest + | ++ Pro NUnit + | ++ Contra XUnit + | ++ Contra MSTest + | ++ Contra NUnit + | +
| + Pro 1 + | ++ Pro 1 + | ++ Pro 1 + | ++ Contra 1 + | ++ Contra 1 + | ++ Contra 1 + | +
| + Pro 2 + | ++ Pro 2 + | ++ Pro 2 + | ++ Contra 2 + | ++ Contra 2 + | ++ Contra 2 + | +
| + Pro 3 + | ++ Pro 3 + | ++ Pro 3 + | ++ Contra 3 + | ++ Contra 3 + | ++ Contra 3 + | +
| + Pro 4 + | ++ Pro 4 + | ++ Pro 4 + | ++ Contra 4 + | ++ Contra 4 + | ++ Contra 4 + | +