Skip to content

Improve support for custom user input: locations, waveforms, coupling #38

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
4 tasks
ctrltz opened this issue Oct 2, 2024 · 1 comment
Open
4 tasks

Improve support for custom user input: locations, waveforms, coupling #38

ctrltz opened this issue Oct 2, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@ctrltz
Copy link
Owner

ctrltz commented Oct 2, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Current issues:

  • location in add_patch_sources should support list of lists
  • correct processing of arrays as waveform requires moving sfreq and duration to the constructor, otherwise different sources can have different length of the time series in samples
  • check that the length of the signal returned by the coupling function is valid
  • how to approach std with custom waveforms?
@ctrltz ctrltz added this to the 0.0.2 milestone Oct 2, 2024
@ctrltz ctrltz removed this from the 0.0.2 milestone Jan 27, 2025
@ctrltz
Copy link
Owner Author

ctrltz commented Jan 27, 2025

Removing from any milestone until really needed. For now, the workflow is built around callables.

@ctrltz ctrltz changed the title Improve support for custom locations (list) and waveforms (array) Improve support for custom user input: locations, waveforms, coupling Jan 27, 2025
@ctrltz ctrltz added the enhancement New feature or request label Mar 25, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@ctrltz